Free gays in the military info graphics download z74.ru

quote.... Gays in the military info graphics .... unquote

Gays should be allowed to fight because they are just as capable as fighting as women and men in our country that fight just because they love someone of the same gender doesn't mean they can't defend our country just as well they are also men and women too they are not any different from you or me we are all created equal as it says in the constitution I myself am not gay but if someone wants to join they should

Anyone, DUMB ENOUGH to want to be in the military, should be allowed in. End of f****** story. That should be the only requirement. I don't care how many push-ups you can do, put on a helmet, go wait in that fox hole and we'll tell you when we need you to kill somebody.

Just because someone doesn't like the opposite sex, doesn't mean they aren't people, or that they aren't as good as anybody else in the military. Gay people are people too. They can't help who they are. They were born attracted to the same sex and there is nothing they can do about it. Why are people who are different treated different? Isn't different good?

My personal opinion regarding the controversy over gay in the military is that nobody should pay attention to the sex preferences when somebody is doing the right job. The issue of gays in the military has been a debate for many years, because either people may admit or not, homosexuals have been served the military for generations. Numerous amounts of people who criticize this issue have no military experience. The chore of an individual in the army does not change if the person is gay, and there are not valid reasons why it should change for that. People should be more concerned about more important topics, because there are not any type of negative outcome of their duties reasoned that they are gay.

If a person is willingly going in to the military to fight for the freedom of our country, then they should be allowed in regardless of their sexual orientation. People don't have to be in the military, it is an option and if they are willing to do that for the U.S. then let them. They are no different then straight people!

Okay let's say the US did use the DADT policy for about 20 years. However, the US realized these homosexual people can actually give help. For people who think that gays will sexually harass them in the showers, then you are a wuss. There are bombs going on outside, and do you think homosexual people will go and say "Oooh, you have nice hair". NO they won't, they know that they need to be focused on battle and will not do anything stupid for the military itself.

Gay people should be allowed to serve in the military because any man or woman who is willing to fight for something that does not fully support them, is way more American, man, or woman than straight soldiers. Gay people in my opinion are a lot more mentally equipped than us straight people considering they always have to adjust to their environment, know how to put up with a lot more BS, and are currently the worlds best/smartest fighters.

Why not? I mean our military needs as much help as it can get and if they aren't letting them in just because they feel "uncomfortable" then seriously get over it and just do what you love doing! Homosexuals have the same rights as we do. It's sad that because people have to hide who they are because people judge them.

The act prohibited any homosexual or bisexual person from disclosing his or her sexual orientation or from speaking about any homosexual relationships, including marriages or other familial attributes, while serving in the United States armed forces. The act specified that service members who disclose that they are homosexual or engage in homosexual conduct should be separated (discharged) except when a service member's conduct was "for the purpose of avoiding or terminating military service" or when it "would not be in the best interest of the armed forces". [4] Since DADT ended in 2011, persons who are openly homosexual and bisexual have been able to serve. [5]

The "don't ask" part of the DADT policy specified that superiors should not initiate investigation of a service member's orientation without witnessing disallowed behaviors, though credible evidence of homosexual behavior could be used to initiate an investigation. Unauthorized investigations and harassment of suspected servicemen and women led to an expansion of the policy to "don't ask, don't tell, don't pursue, don't harass". [6]

Legislation to repeal DADT was enacted in December 2010, specifying that the policy would remain in place until the President , the Secretary of Defense , and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certified that repeal would not harm military readiness, followed by a 60-day waiting period. [7] A July 6, 2011, ruling from a federal appeals court barred further enforcement of the U.S. military's ban on openly gay service members. [8] President Barack Obama , Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta , and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen sent that certification to Congress on July 22, 2011, which set the end of DADT to September 20, 2011. [9]

From the 1950s through the Vietnam War, some notable gay service members avoided discharges despite pre-screening efforts, and when personnel shortages occurred, homosexuals were allowed to serve. [16]

The policy was introduced as a compromise measure in 1993 by President Bill Clinton who campaigned in 1992 on the promise to allow all citizens to serve in the military regardless of sexual orientation. [30] Commander Craig Quigley , a Navy spokesman, expressed the opposition of many in the military at the time when he said, "Homosexuals are notoriously promiscuous" and that in shared shower situations, heterosexuals would have an "uncomfortable feeling of someone watching". [31]

In Congress, Democratic Senator Sam Nunn of Georgia led the contingent that favored maintaining the absolute ban on gays. Reformers were led by Democratic Congressman Barney Frank of Massachusetts , who favored modification (but ultimately voted for the defense authorization bill with the gay ban language), and Barry Goldwater , a former Republican Senator and a retired Major General, [34] who argued on behalf of allowing service by open gays and lesbians. In a June 1993 Washington Post opinion piece, Goldwater wrote: "You don't have to be straight to shoot straight," [35] after Congressional phone lines were flooded by organized anti-gay opposition, indicating substantial public opposition to Clinton's open service proposal. [ clarification needed ]

In accordance with the December 21, 1993, Department of Defense Directive 1332.14, [39] it was legal policy (10 U.S.C. § 654) [40] that homosexuality was incompatible with military service and that persons who engaged in homosexual acts or stated that they are homosexual or bisexual were to be discharged. [30] [37] The Uniform Code of Military Justice , passed by Congress in 1950 and signed by President Harry S Truman , established the policies and procedures for discharging service members. [41]

The full name of the policy at the time was "Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Pursue". The "Don't Ask" provision mandated that military or appointed officials will not ask about or require members to reveal their sexual orientation. The "Don't Tell" stated that a member may be discharged for claiming to be a homosexual or bisexual or making a statement indicating a tendency towards or intent to engage in homosexual activities. The "Don’t Pursue" established what was minimally required for an investigation to be initiated. A "Don’t Harass" provision was added to the policy later. It ensured that the military would not allow harassment or violence against service members for any reason. [36]

This essay was written as an appendix for a lesson plan for high school psychology teachers called The Psychology of Sexual Orientation: a modular lesson plan/teaching resource for high school psychology teachers  (login required). The full lesson plan is part of a series of 19 unit lesson plans developed as a benefit for APA members, which are available in the members-only section of the APA website.

In the United States, few attempts were made to create advocacy groups supporting gay and lesbian relationships until after World War II, although prewar gay life flourished in urban centers such as Greenwich Village and Harlem during the Harlem Renaissance of the 1920s. The disruptions of World War II allowed formerly isolated gay men and women to meet as soldiers, war workers, and other volunteers uprooted from small towns and posted worldwide. Greater awareness, coupled with Senator Joseph McCarthy's investigation of homosexuals holding government jobs during the early 1950s, led to the first American-based political demands for fair treatment in mental health, public policy, and employment.

In 1965, as the civil rights movement won new legislation outlawing racial discrimination, the first gay rights demonstrations took place in Philadelphia and Washington, DC, led by longtime activists Frank Kameny and Barbara Gittings. The turning point for gay liberation came on June 28, 1969, when patrons of the popular Stonewall Inn in New York's Greenwich Village fought back against ongoing police raids of their neighborhood bar. Stonewall is still considered a watershed moment of gay pride and has been commemorated since the 1970s with "pride marches" held every June across the United States. Recent scholarship has called for better acknowledgement of the roles that drag performers, minorities, and transgender patrons played in the Stonewall Riots.

Since 1955, WBC has taken forth the precious from the vile, and so is as the mouth of God (Jer. 15:19). In 1991, WBC began conducting peaceful demonstrations opposing the fag lifestyle of soul-damning, nation-destroying filth.

In response, america showed that it is God's enemy. Now, God is america's enemy: 6890 dead soldiers; $18.16 trillion+ national debt . "Arise, O LORD, in thine anger...because of the rage of mine enemies..." (Ps 7:6)

america crossed the line on June 26, 2003, when SCOTUS ruled in Lawrence v. Texas that we must respect sodomy. SCOTUS sealed your doom on June 26, 2015, with fag marriage. WBC's gospel message is your last hope. More about WBC.

"GOD HATES FAGS" -- though elliptical -- is a profound theological statement, which the world needs to hear more than it needs oxygen, water and bread. The three words, fully expounded, show:

2. the doctrine of reprobation or God's "HATE" involving eternal retribution or the everlasting punishment of most of mankind in Hell forever (e.g., Leviticus 20:13,23, Psalm 5:5, Psalm 11:5, Malachi 1:1-3, Romans 9:11-13, Matthew 7:13,23, John 12:39-40, 1 Peter 2:8, Jude 4, Revelation 13:8, 20:15, 21:27, etc.), and

3. the certainty that all impenitent sodomites (under the elegant metaphor of "FAGS" as the contraction of faggots, fueling the fires of God's wrath) will inevitably go to Hell (e.g., Romans 1:18-32, 1 Corinthians 6:9-11, 1 Timothy 1:8-11, Jude 7, etc.).

The only lawful sexual connection is the marriage bed. All other sex activity is whoremongery and adultery, which will damn the soul forever in Hell. Heb. 13:4. Decadent, depraved, degenerate and debauched America, having bought the lie that It's OK to be gay, has thereby changed the truth of God into a lie, and now worships and serves the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen! Rom. 1:25. But the Word of God abides. Better to be a eunuch if the will of God be so, and make sure of Heaven. Mat. 19:12. Better to be blind or lame, than to be cast into Hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched. Mk. 9:43-48. Abstain, you fools.

This week, the ACLU of Washington is before the U.S. District Court in Tacoma representing Maj. Margaret Witt, a decorated U.S. Air Force flight nurse who was dismissed under the discriminatory and counterproductive policy known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT).

On Thursday, Day Four of the trial, Nathaniel Frank, a senior research fellow at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and author of Unfriendly Fire: How the Gay Ban Undermines the Military and Weakens America , testified on behalf of Maj. Witt.

If Congress decides to let gay men and lesbians serve openly in the U.S. military, the reaction among the vast majority of soldiers is likely to be a big collective yawn, a leading historian said Thursday.

In every case, he said, fears about weakened unit cohesion, falling morale, dropping recruitment rates and heightened harassment and violence preceded the change. Instead, he said, the transitions went so smoothly, people were left wondering what the big deal had been.

In 2006, a Zogby International poll of 545 troops serving in Iraq and Afghanistan found that 73 percent of servicemembers polled "say they are personally comfortable in the presence of gays and lesbians." The same study found that one in four troops who have served in Afghanistan or Iraq personally knows a member of his or her unit who is gay.

Additionally, more than 100 retired admirals and generals have formally voiced their support for repealing DADT . Meanwhile, public support for open service by gay and lesbian troops has grown by a remarkable 31 percentage points since the policy was first introduced nearly two decades ago. A February 2010 Washington Post /ABC News poll found that 75 percent of Americans believe those who are openly gay and lesbian should be able to serve in the U.S. military.

Since 1993, more than 13,000 service members have been discharged due to their sexual orientation. At least 240 of those service members have been discharged since President Obama took office. The Senate will debate DADT as early as this week.  Join the ACLU in urging Congress to act this year to finally end DADT once and for all.

Throughout its history, the US Military  had an inconsistent policy when it came to homosexuals in the military. Prior to World War II, there was no written policy barring homosexuals from serving, although sodomy was considered a crime by military law ever since Revolutionary War times. In 1778, Lieutenant Gotthold Frederick Enslin became the first soldier to be drummed out of the Continental Army for sodomy.

During World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War, the military defined homosexuality as a mental defect and officially barred homosexuals from serving based on medical criteria. However, when personnel needs increased due to combat, the military developed a habit of relaxing its screening criteria. Many homosexual men and women serviced honorably during these conflicts. Unfortunately, these periods were short-lived. As soon as the need for combat personnel decreased, the military would involuntarily discharge them.

It wasn't until 1982 that the Department of Defense officially put in writing that “homosexuality was incompatible with military service,” when they published a DOD directive stating such. According to a 1992 report by the Government Accounting Office, nearly 17,000 men and women were discharged under this new directive during the 1980s.

By the end of the 1980s, reversing the military's policy was emerging as a priority for advocates of gay and lesbian civil rights. Several lesbian and gay male members of the military came out publicly and vigorously challenged their discharges through the legal system.

President Clinton announced that he intended to keep his campaign promise by eliminating military discrimination based on sexual orientation. But, this didn't sit well with the Republican-controlled Congress. Congressional leaders threatened to pass legislation that would bar homosexuals from serving if Clinton issued an executive order changing the policy.

After lengthy public debate and congressional hearings, the President and Senator Sam Nunn, chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, reached a compromise which they labeled Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Don't Pursue. Under its terms, military personnel would not be asked about their sexual orientation and would not be discharged simply for being gay. However having sexual relations, or displaying romantic overtures with members of the same sex, or telling anyone about their sexual orientation is considered "homosexual conduct" under the policy and is a basis for involuntary discharge.

At the time, most military leaders and young enlisted folk (who were forced to live in the barracks with a roommate) took a conservative view about allowing gays to serve openly in the military. But the attitudes of society changed through the next two decades. By 2010, most junior enlisted (the one's who have to live in the barracks), today, saw nothing wrong with homosexuality and would not be bothered by serving with those they know to be gay. Today, almost everyone gets a single room (with no roommate) following basic training and job school. In those few situations where military personnel share living accommodations (such as deployments and ships), it is generally several military members living together.

In December of 2010, the House and Senate voted in favor to repeal the policy known as "don't ask, don't tell." President Obama then signed it into law December 22, 2010. A repeal is ant action of revoking or annulling a law or congressional act. The nation decided that by September 20, 2011, homosexuals would no longer fear discharge from the military by admitting to their sexual preference. Homosexuals have the freedom to serve in the armed forces openly.

Cianni's collection, which is slated for an April 30 release and published by Daylight Books , follows American military officers who faced enormous challenges before (and during) the days of " don't ask, don't tell ," (DADT) as well as their subsequent journey following the controversial legislation's 2011 repeal .

Zachary Werth (Specialist, Idaho Army National Guard, 2007-2010) and Dustin Hiersekorn (Private, U.S. Marine Corps Reserve, 2010), Boise, Idaho 2011 Werth received a general discharge under honorable conditions, erroneous enlistment; used as a smokescreen for homosexuality, while Hiersekorn was discharged for medical reasons two weeks after enlisting.

Cianni told The Huffington Post that he traveled through the U.S. from November 2009 to June 2013, during which he shot photographs and recorded oral histories of roughly 100 gay and lesbian service members and veterans, all of which recounted the impact that the ban on serving openly had on their careers in the armed forces and lives afterward.

"The effort to gain their trust was a delicate process and the resolve to achieve it proved fruitful in many ways, particularly on a personal level," Cianni, who is based in Newburgh, N.Y., said. "I remember leaving each time as emotionally drained as they were, recognizing how horrible some of their experiences were and what personal sacrifices they made."

Victor Fehrenbach -- Boise, Idaho 2011 (Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Air Force, 1991-2011) Retired F-15E Fighter Pilot. Tours of duty in Iraq (including Operation Iraqi Freedom), Kuwait, and Afghanistan; 88 combat missions, 400 combat hours; successfully fought DADT after coming out on Rachel Maddow's show in 2009 .

"I hope these photographs and interviews honor their lives in service to their country and stand as a testament to everyone's right to choose to serve our country based on our beliefs and in a way we see fit," he said.


Debra Fowler -- Lowell, Mass. 2013 (Specialist, U.S. Army, 1986-1988) Korean Linguist. Defense Language Institute Soldier’s Award; dishonorable discharge, fraudulent entry; outed when being investigated for top-secret security clearance.

The United States Air Force declares its core values as "Integrity First, Service Before Self, Excellence in All We Do." However, the treatment and trial of Air Force 1st Lt. Joshua Seefried is an affront to those values.

Gender has always been on my mind -- or in my face -- whether I like it or not. As a budding feminist and then a young lesbian with short hair, I was called "Sir" on more than one occasion. I didn't like it, but was happy to have the privileges that being perceived as male brought. I am over six feet tall and trained as a martial artist.

Now that he has declared his candidacy for president, after flirting with one in 2012, it is galling to see him rise in the polls presumably due to his telling it like it is, which a lot of people find refreshing, punctuating his hyperbole with cheap insults hurled at anyone who challenges him.

We have so much to be grateful for in 2015, but we are not finished. Together we must break the barriers remaining that result in a second-class citizen status, and we must continue to fight until all military families are treated equally.

Who knows how many stories like this one have gone untold; how many lives were wrecked by policies rooted in pure prejudice, whether they were discharged or in hiding; and how many closeted servicemembers worked from the inside to dismantle, brick by brick, the DADT wall?

As we celebrate the 60th anniversary of Brown, we are reminded that much like segregation, now is the time for the Supreme Court to address the important issue of the " inherently unequal" ban on same-gender marriages.

One of the speakers at this year's National Character & Leadership Symposium was Kelly Shackelford, the President & CEO of the Liberty Institute, which describes itself as "the largest legal organization dedicated solely to defending and restoring religious liberty in America."

For those who remained in the military, the ever-present fear kept them firmly entrenched in the closet, unable to speak openly or acknowledge their own families in public. That was just the way it was. Then history shifted.

 

 

 

Categories

Photo Gallery